Case Intel reads the Telangana High Court cause list at 19:00 and again at 06:30, finds your matters on it, and carries each one forward: the order that followed, what your side must do, the fee it earned.
Invite-only. Telangana High Court cause lists today; more courts as they are added.
Cause list · Court Hall 3High Court for the State of Telangana
fetched 19:02Sample data
ItemCasePartiesAdvocate
9WP/20417/2025P. Srinivas vs. State of TelanganaAdv. K. Rao
10CRP/1182/2024Sai Agencies vs. N. LaxmiAdv. S. Begum
11WA/772/2025GHMC vs. R. VenkateshStanding Counsel
12WP/9930/2026A. Fathima vs. TSRTCAdv. P. Naidu
13CMA/415/2023United Insurance vs. B. AnjaiahAdv. V. Kumar
14WP/14562/2024Ramesh Kumar vs. TSSPDCLAdv. Meera Reddyyours
15WP/3318/2026M. Rajitha vs. Union of IndiaAdv. D. Prasad
16AS/208/2022K. Bhaskar vs. K. SudhaAdv. R. Iyer
17WP/18840/2025Telangana Dairy vs. StateAdv. A. Khan
18CA/2231/2023Lakshmi Traders vs. Union of IndiaAdv. Meera Reddyyours
19CRLP/5521/2026S. Ravi vs. State of TelanganaPublic Prosecutor
20WP/7004/2024N. Gopal vs. HMDAAdv. T. Reddy
For 02 Sep 2026Your matters · Item 14 · Item 18
Scroll
Every district.Every court complex.One search.
01 · Find your matters
Search the whole state. Not one court at a time.
The eCourts advocate search covers one court complex at a time. Case Intel runs your name or bar code through every district and complex in the state, in the background, and hands you one list to import.
One complex fails, the run carries on. Retry just the gaps later.
Progress is saved after every district, so nothing found is lost.
Every row is checked against the name you searched. Rows that can't be checked say so.
Abstract, not a mapSample run
Run complete · results saved after every districtGajwel complex didn't answer · isolated, run continues
Found under your nameSample data
Matches land here as each district finishes…
CRLP/887/2024
City Civil Court, Hyderabad · State vs. Suresh Chandra
Court record: MEERA REDDY
Name match
OS/556/2021
City Civil Court, Hyderabad · Bhavani Enterprises vs. Narsimha Rao
Court record: M. MEERA REDDY
Name match
OS/1120/2023
L.B. Nagar · K. Padma vs. S. Anil
Court record: (advocate cell blank)
Not verified
MC/64/2025
Nalgonda · R. Kavitha vs. R. Mahesh
Court record: MEERA REDDY K
Name match
1 complex failedRetry failed districts
02 · Read the order
The order arrives as a scan. You get what you must do.
Each order PDF is summarised once, when it arrives: what the court did, then your side's directions, kept apart from the other side's. Your directions become tasks with due dates.
Due dates come from a fixed table of phrases like “within four weeks”, not from the AI.
Unreadable, very short or routine adjournment orders skip the AI entirely.
Only your side's directions become tasks, and only once your party role is known.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF JULY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT: HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION No. 14562 OF 2024
Ramesh Kumar…PetitionerANDTSSPDCL…Respondent
ORDER:
1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent on I.A. No. 2 of 2026.
2. The interim order dated 03.06.2026 restraining the respondent from disconnecting the supply is extended until the next date of hearing, subject to the condition below.
3. The petitioner is directed to deposit 50% of the disputed arrears, i.e. Rs. 1,84,000/-, with the Registry within four weeks from today, and shall file proof of such deposit before the next date of hearing.
4. The respondent shall not disconnect the power supply in the meantime, subject to compliance with the above.
5. List on 02.09.2026 for final arguments.
SD/- K.S.J · //TRUE COPY//
CERTIFIED COPY
W.P. No. 14562 of 2024ORDERdt. 29.07.2026Certified copy · sample
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF JULY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT: HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION No. 14562 OF 2024
Ramesh Kumar…PetitionerANDTSSPDCL…Respondent
ORDER:
1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent on I.A. No. 2 of 2026.
2. The interim order dated 03.06.2026 restraining the respondent from disconnecting the supply is extended until the next date of hearing, subject to the condition below.
3. The petitioner is directed to deposit 50% of the disputed arrears, i.e. Rs. 1,84,000/-, with the Registry within four weeks from today, and shall file proof of such deposit before the next date of hearing.
4. The respondent shall not disconnect the power supply in the meantime, subject to compliance with the above.
5. List on 02.09.2026 for final arguments.
SD/- K.S.J · //TRUE COPY//
CERTIFIED COPY
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF JULY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT: HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION No. 14562 OF 2024
Ramesh Kumar…PetitionerANDTSSPDCL…Respondent
ORDER:
1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent on I.A. No. 2 of 2026.
2. The interim order dated 03.06.2026 restraining the respondent from disconnecting the supply is extended until the next date of hearing, subject to the condition below.
3. The petitioner is directed to deposit 50% of the disputed arrears, i.e. Rs. 1,84,000/-, with the Registry within four weeks from today, and shall file proof of such deposit before the next date of hearing.
4. The respondent shall not disconnect the power supply in the meantime, subject to compliance with the above.
5. List on 02.09.2026 for final arguments.
SD/- K.S.J · //TRUE COPY//
CERTIFIED COPY
Sample order
Order overview · 29 Jul 2026Sample data
Stay on disconnection extended to the next date, on condition that the petitioner deposits half the disputed arrears.
You · Petitioner
Deposit 50% of disputed arrears (Rs. 1,84,000) with the Registry26 Augwithin four weeks
File proof of deposit02 Sepbefore the next date
Respondent · not your task
Shall not disconnect the power supply until the next date
Next date 02 Sep 2026 · final arguments
Tasks · your side only24 Aug – 06 Sep 2026
Mon24
Tue25
Wed26Deposit
Thu27
Fri28
Sat29
Sun30
Mon31
Tue1
Wed2HearingProof
Thu3
Fri4
Sat5
Sun6
Deposit · 26 AugFile proof · 02 Sep
06:30
03 · 06:30, the list is read again
A misread column looks exactly like “not listed.”
So the cause-list PDF isn't read in text order. Every character is placed by its position on the page, the columns are found afresh in each document, and each serial number is paired with its case by height.
The real lists come in at least three layouts. No column position is hardcoded.
“None of your matters are listed” is the one wrong answer this must never give.
Read at 19:00, read again at 06:30. Telangana High Court lists today.
Read in text order12 13 14 15 16 17 WP/9930/2026 CMA/415/2023 WP/14562/2024 WP/3318/2026 AS/208/2022 WP/18840/2025
Read by position → 13 CMA/415/2023 · 14 WP/14562/2024 · 15 WP/3318/2026 …
CAUSE LIST · COURT HALL 302.09.2026
S.NO.CASE NO.PARTIES
12WP/9930/2026A. Fathima vs. TSRTC
13CMA/415/2023United Insurance vs. B. Anjaiah
14WP/14562/2024Ramesh Kumar vs. TSSPDCLListed
15WP/3318/2026M. Rajitha vs. Union of India
16AS/208/2022K. Bhaskar vs. K. Sudha
17WP/18840/2025Telangana Dairy vs. State
S.No. · x 36.8
Case · x 112.4
Parties · x 318.0
ListedItem 14 · Court Hall 3 · WP/14562/2024Sample data
04 · Ask the file
Ask your case file a question. Get the page it came from.
Case Bot answers from the documents uploaded to your case, with citations back to the passages it used. It searches by meaning and by keyword together, then reranks what it found.
Every retrieval step is filtered to your own documents, not just the screen you see.
If the owner filter is missing, the search refuses to run at all.
When the best match is weak, the answer says so.
Case Bot · WP/14562/2024
What did the court direct my client to deposit, and by when?
Searching your documents only
order_2026-07-29.pdf[1] …directed to deposit 50% of the disputed arrears, i.e. Rs. 1,84,000/-, with the Registry within four weeks…
writ_petition.pdf[2] …the disputed arrears of Rs. 3,68,000/- raised without notice…
counter_affidavit.pdf
ia_2_of_2026.pdf
Another advocate's documentsnever searched · never citedowner filter
Everything else the morning needs. Already on the hearing.
Five more things that used to live in a diary, a folder and the margin of a cause list.
Keep scrolling →Swipe for five more →
01Hearing prep sheet
Prep sheetWP/14562/2024
Cause list
Item 14 · Court Hall 3
Last order
Stay on disconnection extended to the next date, on condition that the petitioner deposits half the disputed arrears.
Open tasks
File proof of deposit · 02 Sep
State of the matter
Sample data
One page before you walk in.
The cause-list slot, the last order, open tasks and documents on one PDF, with a short state-of-the-matter paragraph. It is cached, and written again only when the facts change.
02Conflict check at intake
New matter · your clientS. Anil
Possible conflict
S. Anil is the opposite party in your OS/1120/2023.
I've reviewed this. Continue.
Sample data
Same party, other side. You hear about it first.
A new matter's parties are compared with your own cases for the same party on opposite sides. It warns and asks you to acknowledge; it never hard-blocks, and never looks at another advocate's cases.
03Limitation deadlines
Earliest possible date14 Oct 2026
s.12(2) Time to obtain a certified copy: noted, not added
s.4 Court closed on the last day: noted, not applied
s.5 Condonation of delay: noted, not assumed
Sample data
The earliest possible date, not the most hopeful one.
Periods come from a rules table written into the code. The computation is conservative: the earliest possible date, with Section 12(2), 4 and 5 caveats stated as notes rather than applied. You add them; nothing fires on its own.
04Appearance-fee invoices
PendingInvoicedPaid
InvoiceINV-0007
Appearance · 02 Sep 2026₹5,000
Bill toRamesh Kumar
PDF
Sample data
Every appearance ends as a PDF you can send.
A fee moves Pending, Invoiced, Paid, and each invoice is numbered in your own running series. Appearance, hotel, flight or other, several to a hearing.
HotelHotel Minerva Grand · 1 nighthotel-confirmation.pdf
Upload against 02 Sep 2026
Sample data
The ticket lives with the hearing.
Tickets and stays uploaded against the hearing, so everything for an outstation date sits in one place.
06 · Whose file is it
Every matter has an owner. Every query asks who's asking.
each square, one record · lit: yours · dark: someone else's, never returned
Invite-only
Accounts open by invitation.
Each account starts from a single-use invite, issued by hand. There is no self-service sign-up.
Per-advocate isolation
Every record has an owner.
Cases, documents, hearings, fees: each row carries its owner, and every list, view and edit is filtered to the advocate signed in. A test fails if a new endpoint is added without being scoped or deliberately reviewed.
Owner-scoped retrieval
Case Bot only searches your documents.
The search takes the owner as a required input and filters every leg by it, meaning and keyword alike. Narrowing to one case narrows within your documents; it never replaces the owner filter.
What it won't do
It won't read cause lists beyond the Telangana High Court yet.
It won't tell two advocates with the same name apart. It shows the court's own record and lets you judge.
It won't hard-block a conflict. It warns; you decide.
It won't apply limitation exceptions for you. Sections 12(2), 4 and 5 stay as notes.
It won't send routine adjournment orders to the AI at all.
It won't file anything on your behalf.
It isn't affiliated with eCourts or with any court.
10:30
Court Hall 3. Item 14. You're ready.
Case Intel is invite-only. Ask for an invitation, and bring your name or bar code. The search does the rest.